You are hereAnand's Collection / Young and stuck in mud

Young and stuck in mud


By anand - Posted on 23 November 2008

The avalanche of mud, slush and debris and the consequent clean-up operation are timely physical reminders and reflections of the state of our tiny nation. We are submerged in an unhappy state of crime and ineffective, arrogant government, where our cries fall on deaf ears.

The river of crime and the dirty slush of indifferent government bureaucracy continue to deny citizens the right to a basic decent standard of life in the midst of high-rise buildings and international conferences that cater for the ego of our tin god Prime Minister, who fancies himself as a world leader, private jet and all.

In the midst of all this panic and hysteria, one of the unnoticed and less-talked about pieces of social debris appeared: school violence. Shaquille Antoine, 14, Form Three student of Tranquillity Government Secondary School in Port-of-Spain, was robbed and beaten unconscious by six schoolmates last Thursday. He is begging the Ministry of Education to have him transferred to another school, because he fears for his life. Antoine was beaten and kicked about the head, chest and ribs, because he refused to hand over his cellphone, school allowance, and his $5 stud earring.

Traumatised and depressed, he said he was scared to return to the school, for fear of either being killed or badly beaten again. “I really don’t want to go back there, because it was not the first time I was attacked; it was the first time, though, that I was actually beaten. And now that I have survived that, I really don’t want to return to that school,” he declared.

Ironic respect

Antoine gave a chilling account of school life. He explained that many students were routinely robbed, attacked and bullied at the school by students who had formed gangs. The administration, it would appear, is barely surviving the onslaught itself, and seems content to sweep it all under the carpet, so hapless students remain stuck in the mud.

Student indiscipline and gang violence are motivated by the sense of ironic respect and admiration it brings from one’s peers. A rebellious and non-conformist student in our present school culture is transformed into a hero, because of the ineffective measures to combat indiscipline. Suspension is seen as a mere “holiday” from school, and this is the worst “punishment” that teachers and principals are empowered to administer.

The trauma of being bullied, slapped in front of your teenage girlfriend, beaten for your refusal to hand over your own lunch money, cellphone, stud earring, etc, lasts a lifetime. Every decent student feels a sense of hurt when the system that they trust and respect seems powerless and clueless as to how to deal with a student offender who has violated their rights and self-esteem.

Badjohn students command respect in schools. You are forced to pretend that you want to be their friend because you fear them. The irony is that these are the student “leaders” that our education system breeds and fosters.

Greater emphasis must be placed on the victims and the reaction of the larger student population to the treatment and punishment of indisciplined students. No one focuses on the good ones. That is why poor Shaquille is begging for a transfer while his attackers remain comfortably ensconced at the school that tolerates and covers up their illegal wrongdoing.

Forgotten victim

The focus is almost invariably on the rehabilitation of the offender and his gentle re-introduction into the school system. No thought is given to the victim, how the rest of students think, what they expect and how they would react to or interpret what is done. Why should Shaquille have to leave? They should be the ones to leave!

The way to deal with student indiscipline is to make sure that the offender is properly punished, so that an effective deterrent is introduced at an early stage. The solution to indiscipline in schools must cater for the expectations and reactions of the large body of innocent disciplined students.

This is the only way it will inspire and win the confidence of the good students. If the offender is not properly punished (in proportion to the offence), he is likely to continue his badjohn behaviour, because the rewards (popularity, respect, fear and friends galore) by far outweigh the punishment.

But this is only part of the problem. The more dangerous consequence is that the burning sense of disappointment and betrayal the rest of well-behaved students feel leads to an early loss of confidence in the education system that society has put together to nurture and protect them.

I firmly believe that greater emphasis should be placed on the large body of diligent, disciplined students that anticipate swift and effective punishment for indiscipline. By trying to be gentle on the bad ones, we may ironically be loosing all the good ones by sending the wrong signal to them.

I'm afraid Anand's commentary really demonstrates a lack of roundness. WTF do I mean by dat? Well, yes I see where he is coming from, that the good should not suffer disproportionately etc etc - and that there needs to be proper focus on those who cause the most trouble.

However, the commentary lacks fullness because it is as bad as some psychologist barking that these troubled young criminals all need high-doses of counselling, or some over-zealous religious leader barking that they all need to be treated with 'lurv' and respect, and to be shown the way and the light, or a psychiatrist suggesting that they need to be treated for attention deficit disorders.

Anand's commentary takes a typical one-sided view of the problem. Typical? Yes. In T&T every person believes they have the solution and they are willing to jump up and shout about it. So Anand sticks to what he knows best i.e. justice and punishment. In reality the problem of crime in many nations is poorly understood by politicians and lay people alike. It is no suprise that politicians bark on about getting 'tough on crime and the causes of crime'. That is the kind of stuff that resonates with electorates. In reality if you ask Mr Politician and Mr Lay Person what are the causes of crime - dey eh know B from bullfoot. I'm speaking in general of course and largely based on my experience of lay persons and people in high places.

'Punishment', as a concept, for lawyers and criminal justice personnel has little to do with beating people with a stick - although on Monkey Rock the birch is still an option for some offences. We won't get into the three or four R's of punishment here.

In the psychological world - which I happen to know very well - punishment is the least likely way to bring about enduring change in conduct. Note the word 'enduring'. However, you can't say that to a judge, lawyer or lay person. They'll look at you like eef yuh maad (aka mad). Why? Because law and the minds that study law are rivetted in tradition - and lay persons jes eh know any better.

Anand's statement "If the offender is not properly punished (in proportion to the offence), he is likely to continue his badjohn behaviour, because the rewards (popularity, respect, fear and friends galore) by far outweigh the punishment." - might sound good to the majority and all who live mainly in the legal profession. There is a kind of realistic mundane appeal to it, which many may call 'common sense'. However, when you come to changing individual minds and groups of minds in communities to move away from crime, 'common sense' is not the thing that works. If it was so simple then strategies would have been put in place 10 years ago and we would not be seeing what we are today in T&T's crime situation.

The matter of crime control is a complex issue. It becomes more complex among young persons in groups. It shouldn't be that each person with their respective expertise proclaims 'this is the way forward'. No - what is needed is a co-ordinated multi-facted approach to the complex problem. Those who want to see real and lasting solutions need to gather the best expertise and thinking from: social scientists, psychologists, social workers, probation officers, lawyers, doctors, educators, community workers etc etc etc.

Whilst punishment is a part of the solution it isn't nearly the major part of it.

And yet your argument Captain, does not evidence what we see daily... that countries with a greater strictness in punishment eg China, or Islamic countries, have far less crime than we can ever hope for.

Maybe the problem lies not in the punishment, but in liberal thinkers who overthink and does not do.

I don't believe I proffered an argument for your premise - and therefore I am not burdened to provide the evidence. But you are for your own statement. 

I agree with you though even in the absence of your evidence. In fact I would suggest that the most totalitarian of regimes (hypothetically)  would amputate the limbs of all its people, cut out their tongues and sexual organs, cork their arses airtight! In fact why have people at all, to take the argument to total absurdity? To stop all crime - just eliminate people!

Anand's comments were clearly relevant to the foundation of a Westminster style of government, not communist, socialist or Islamic types. Totalitarianism is what it is. Did we not see what happened when Saddam's totalitarian regime crumbled suddenly? The American's discovered and are still discovering that Saddam had created a purpose for himself. Dare I go into that. I hope not.

No Jumbie, we are living in a democratic society - of a kind, and so do Monkey Rock crawlers. Crime is a feature of human existence in all societies and we contract to live with a certain level of it in our democratic societies. I hope you need no statistics to agree with me that the murder rate in England is substantially lower than on Monkey Rock - and the murder rate on Monkey Rock is about 5 times that of New York City.

My argument was focussed on one key point, that Anand's commentary lacked roundness - and that fact is self-evident.  Secondarily I suggested how those who want to really control crime could go about it (in a T&T-type society). Me eh business wid China an' t'ing. I was referring to lasting solutions to crime control - not crime elimination, which is an impossibility in a liberal democratic society.

 

Most recent poll

Compared to your expectation of living say in England, how safe do you feel living in T&T (in general)?
I feel very safe
6%
I feel somewhat safe
2%
I'm undecided
6%
I don't really feel safe
36%
I feel very unsafe
50%
Total votes: 50